From CAD to Reality: JINGYING’s Complete OEM Process for American Client’s Custom Earring Production
Executive Summary
This 5,000-word technical whitepaper documents JINGYING Jewelry Manufacturing’s end-to-end OEM service for a U.S.-based fashion brand’s custom earring collection. The case study examines how an American client’s CAD designs were transformed into 12,000 pairs of finished earrings, highlighting:
-
Cross-border design collaboration protocols
-
Technical adaptations for mass production
-
Quality assurance systems meeting U.S. market standards
-
Logistics solutions for trans-Pacific jewelry shipping
Table des matières
-
Project Initiation Phase
-
1.1 Client Profile: U.S. Fashion Brand Requirements
-
1.2 Design Handoff: CAD File Analysis & DFM Review
-
1.3 Regulatory Compliance Planning (CPSIA, Prop 65)
-
-
Pre-Production Engineering
-
2.1 CAD Optimization for Manufacturing
-
2.2 Sélection des matériaux & Sourcing Strategy
-
2.3 Prototyping Process (3D Printing vs. Hand Samples)
-
-
Production Execution
-
3.1 Metal Fabrication Techniques
-
3.2 En pierre & Surface Finishing
-
3.3 Quality Control Checkpoints
-
-
Conditionnement & Compliance
-
4.1 U.S. Conditionnement & Labeling Requirements
-
4.2 Hazardous Materials Testing
-
4.3 Export Documentation
-
-
Logistics & Delivery
-
5.1 Air vs. Ocean Shipping Cost Analysis
-
5.2 Customs Clearance Strategies
-
5.3 Inventory Management for Multi-Shipment Orders
-
-
Post-Production Evaluation
-
6.1 Defect Rate Analysis
-
6.2 Client Feedback Implementation
-
6.3 Process Improvements for Future Orders
-
1. Project Initiation Phase
1.1 Client Profile
The Massachusetts-based client requested:
-
Produit: 925 silver geometric drop earrings with cubic zirconia
-
Quantité: 12,000 couple (4 color variants)
-
Delivery: 3 shipments over 8 mois
-
Certifications: Must comply with California Proposition 65
1.2 CAD File Analysis
JINGYING’s engineering team identified 3 required modifications:
-
Prong Thickness Adjustment (Original 0.3mm → Modified 0.5mm for durability)
-
Hinge Mechanism Redesign (For easier assembly)
-
Weight Reduction (From 8.2g to 6.5g per earring)
Tableau: CAD Design vs. Production-Ready Comparison
Design Element | Original CAD | Modified Version | Reason |
---|---|---|---|
En pierre | 4-prong | 6-prong | Security improvement |
Post Length | 7MM | 8MM | U.S. piercing standard |
Surface Finish | Mat | Brushed | Better scratch resistance |
1.3 Compliance Documentation
-
Conducted RHOS testing for silver alloy
-
Prepared CPSIA tracking labels
-
Verified nickel content below 0.05%
2. Pre-Production Engineering
2.1 Rapid Prototyping Process
-
Produced 4 prototype versions using:
-
SLA 3D printing (For form verification)
-
Lost-wax casting (For metal samples)
-
Hand-fabricated samples (For mechanism testing)
-
Prototyping Timeline
3. Production Execution
3.1 Manufacturing Workflow
-
Silver Casting
-
Used vacuum casting machines
-
Achieved 92% material utilization rate
-
-
Automated Polishing
-
Implemented robotic polishing arms
-
Reduced hand-polishing time by 65%
-
-
Laser Stone Setting
-
Precision CZ placement with 0.1mm tolerance
-
0.3% stone loss rate (Industry average: 1.2%)
-
3.2 Quality Control Metrics
-
Précision dimensionnelle: ±0.15mm
-
Stone tightness: 50g pull test
-
Surface defects: <0.5% allowance
4. Packaging Solutions
4.1 Custom Packaging Components
-
Recyclable PET blister cards
-
Soy-based ink printing
-
Multilingual care instructions
Packaging Cost Breakdown
Component | Cost per Unit | Notes |
---|---|---|
Blister Card | $0.18 | Custom die-cut |
Polybag | $0.05 | Prop 65 warning printed |
Barcode Label | $0.03 | GS1-128 compliant |
5. Logistics Management
5.1 Shipping Cost Comparison
Method | Cost | Transit Time | Insurance |
---|---|---|---|
Air Express | $8,400 | 5 jours | 110% coverage |
Ocean LCL | $3,200 | 28 jours | Basic coverage |
Hybrid Air-Ocean | $5,100 | 14 jours | Full coverage |
Selected hybrid solution with:
-
First batch via air (for market testing)
-
Subsequent shipments via ocean
6. Key Performance Indicators
6.1 Production Efficiency Metrics
-
First-pass yield rate: 94.7%
-
On-time delivery: 100%
-
Return rate: 0.8% (Mostly for minor finish issues)
Conclusion
This project established JINGYING’s capability to:
-
Accurately interpret Western design aesthetics
-
Implement design-for-manufacturing improvements
-
Maintain rigorous U.S. compliance standards
The successful partnership has led to:
-
30% cost reduction versus client’s previous manufacturer
-
15% faster production cycle time
-
Ongoing contract for 5 new designs